What Is Reunification Therapy?

By Kaytie Mero, M.A. and Dr. Katrina Kuzyszyn-Jones

Reunification therapy is designed to repair parent-child relationships and help children have healthy relationships with both parents. Reunification therapy is often court-ordered due to the child refusing to spend time with one parent. Such refusal tends to occur after the parents have separated or divorced, resulting in a favored parent and a rejected parent. This means that the child has formed an alliance with one parent and has excluded the other. Therefore, the goal of reunification therapy is for the therapist to help reunify the child and rejected parent, to help transform the polarized good and bad beliefs and attitudes of family members, and help the parents implement appropriate parenting and co-parenting roles in order to support the child’s overall development. Intervention is not only tailored to the individual family but is highly structured and supportive. New skills, such as co-parenting and parallel parenting, are introduced and practiced within a safe and secure setting. Reunification therapy focuses on solutions rather than past problems and helps the family move forward in a new chapter.

Reunification therapy is often ordered in situations where allegations of abuse are inconclusive. While there are no standards for how to conduct the actual therapy, there are guidelines regarding the best practices for the structure of reunification therapy. As the keystone of the intervention, the court order should specify: (1) the goals for the intervention, (2) the court’s expectation that all family members shall participate and cooperate, (3) the necessary structure for the implementation of the intervention, and (4) the court’s role in monitoring the family’s progress, thereby creating and insuring accountability of each family member to work towards these goals. In addition, the court, not the therapist, needs to determine the final goal for reunification. Often, reunification counselors are ordered to begin counseling, and they are told to initiate a stair step visitation schedule. However, the schedule is not clearly defined or a long term goal is not established, and the counselors cannot make parenting plan recommendations or rulings per the current standard of practice, so they need the court’s guidance in order to proceed ethically.

It is particularly important that there is agreement upon the major goal of the intervention, that is, the family work be directed to restoring family functioning so the child can attain and maintain the best possible relationship with both parents, and that this statement be put into the court order. The parents must sign the therapist’s treatment agreement, which reiterates the court’s statements about treatment goals, providing yet another chance for them to affirm their understanding, acceptance, and willingness to work toward these goals. The court order should include details such as the dates when the court will be reviewing the progress of the family within the intervention, a provision that neither parent has the power to unilaterally terminate treatment, as well as a statement that there will be consequences and sanctions, financial or related to the parent’s time with the child—for a parent’s failure to meet the court’s expectations.

In order to facilitate this process, KKJ uses a team approach. Dr. KKJ is the lead for the treatment team as the reunification therapist; Ms. Mero is the child therapist lead. Our other therapists, can then work with the ‘favored’ or ‘rejected’ parent. Research supports that the most important person in the process is the ‘favored’ parent; they must buy into the process in order for it to be successful. This is why KKJ takes this approach to reunification therapy.

Want more information? Please contact drkatrina@kkjpsych.com or kaytie@kkjpsych.com or call 919-493-1975.


You may also like

Emotional Support Animal Evaluations: Comprehensive Assessments for a Controversial Issue

In recent years, the use of animals to provide comfort, assistance, and therapy for individuals with various medical and psychological needs has gained attention, particularly with the rise of individuals relying on “Emotional Support Animals” (ESAs). However, there are several different types of animal-assisted interventions, and ESAs differ in important ways from service animals and therapy animals, for example. The use of ESAs became controversial as an increasing number of people began to claim their pets as ESAs and as industries appeared claiming to be able to “certify” ESAs. Further, individuals may seek a psychological evaluation to demonstrate that their animal qualifies as an ESA, and current recommendations are for these evaluations to be quite comprehensive.

Spread the love
Read More

The Team Approach to Forensic Evaluations

Because the standards for forensic evaluations must be high, KKJ uses a team approach when conducting most forensic evaluations. This article will explain the reasoning behind this approach and suggest best practices for a team-based model of forensic evaluations.

Spread the love
Read More

Understanding a Therapist’s Duty to Warn Part 2

Our previous article introduces the concept of a therapist’s duty to warn, which was first brought to light by the 1976 Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California case. Specific to the state of North Carolina, there is no explicit duty to warn law. However…

Spread the love
Read More

We know it's not always easy to ask for help.
But sometimes talking with a compassionate, insightful professional can provide answers and clarity.

We know it's not always easy to ask for help. But sometimes talking with a compassionate, insightful professional can provide answers and clarity.