Alternative Dispute Resolution Compared To High Conflict Divorce

The best course of action for families experiencing divorce is for the parents to agree upon a parenting plan. This may involve two attorneys working with parents to reach a cooperative and voluntary agreement between the parents. When parents reach an agreement, they can structure their parenting plan in the best manner to meet their and their children’s needs. Some parents use Collaborative Divorce, Mediation, or traditional divorce with cooperation between the attorneys outside of court.

Parents often chose these alternative routes over going to court because judges do not know you and your family. When you go to court, you lose control over the details of your custody plan. Court battles over custody are expensive, emotionally draining, and can permanently damage your children. There are no winners in high conflict child custody cases. In most cases, couples are able to put aside their differences, and they can craft creative compromises regarding their parenting plan. However, there are situations where court is necessary. North Carolina defines High Conflict Divorce as a situation that involves excessive litigation, anger and distrust, verbal abuse, physical aggression or threats or physical aggression, and difficulty communication about and cooperating in the care of the children. When a judge has made the determination that a case meets the requirements for a High Conflict Divorce, they may order therapy for the family members, Psychological Evaluations, Custody Evaluations, Substance Abuse Evaluations, Parenting Coordination, and/or Reunification Therapy.

If you are experiencing a high conflict divorce, we can help you navigate this extremely stressful situation with compassion and empathy. Our goal is to help you reach a dignified and respectful resolution that feels fair. Contact lisa@kkjpsych.com for more information.

 Previous
Next

You may also like

Emotional Support Animal Evaluations: Comprehensive Assessments for a Controversial Issue

In recent years, the use of animals to provide comfort, assistance, and therapy for individuals with various medical and psychological needs has gained attention, particularly with the rise of individuals relying on “Emotional Support Animals” (ESAs). However, there are several different types of animal-assisted interventions, and ESAs differ in important ways from service animals and therapy animals, for example. The use of ESAs became controversial as an increasing number of people began to claim their pets as ESAs and as industries appeared claiming to be able to “certify” ESAs. Further, individuals may seek a psychological evaluation to demonstrate that their animal qualifies as an ESA, and current recommendations are for these evaluations to be quite comprehensive.

Spread the love
Read More

The Team Approach to Forensic Evaluations

Because the standards for forensic evaluations must be high, KKJ uses a team approach when conducting most forensic evaluations. This article will explain the reasoning behind this approach and suggest best practices for a team-based model of forensic evaluations.

Spread the love
Read More

Understanding a Therapist’s Duty to Warn Part 2

Our previous article introduces the concept of a therapist’s duty to warn, which was first brought to light by the 1976 Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California case. Specific to the state of North Carolina, there is no explicit duty to warn law. However…

Spread the love
Read More

We know it's not always easy to ask for help.
But sometimes talking with a compassionate, insightful professional can provide answers and clarity.

We know it's not always easy to ask for help. But sometimes talking with a compassionate, insightful professional can provide answers and clarity.

CLICK HERE TO CONTACT US